Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[SomeDude]

On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 01:26:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 5:10 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> Remedy adopting D
>
> Saying that would be premature and incorrect at the moment. We 
> still have to ensure that Remedy wins with D. This is an 
> ongoing thing.

Yes, but what H.S. Theoh wrote about the desperate need of 
process is still true and correct. Like many others here, I think 
it's the biggest problem with D right now for its adoption. I for 
one will never consider using D for my main line of work without 
a true STABLE branch: a branch you can rely on. And yet I'm 
pretty sold to the language, but when your project is at stake, 
what you need is security. And the current development scheme 
doesn't provide that.