Compilation strategy

[evilrat]

On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 at 01:30:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> If we implement a way of "hiding" implementation details that 
> *allows*
> CTFE and templates (and thus one up the C++ situation), this 
> will create
> a stronger incentive for D adoption. It doesn't matter if it's 
> not hard
> to "unhide" the implementation; we don't lose anything (having 
> no way to
> hide implementation is what we already have), plus it increases 
> our
> chances of adoption -- esp. by enterprises, who are generally 
> the kind
> of people who even care about this issue in the first place, 
> and who are
> the people we *want* to attract. Sounds like a win to me.
>

i agreed with that, involving big guys is necessary to make 
language live, if we don't than D would become just another fan 
loved language. it's really bad...

well, that's the point.