Javascript bytecode
Brad Roberts
braddr at slice-2.puremagic.com
Tue Dec 18 17:57:50 PST 2012
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/18/12 7:29 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Which right now suffers from some silly things like writefln not being
> > able to be made @safe, just because some obscure formatting parameter is
> > un at safe. Which is exactly how @safe was designed, of course. Except
> > that it makes SafeD ... a bit of a letdown, shall we say? - when it
> > comes to practical real-world applications.
> >
> > (And just to be clear, I'm all for SafeD, but it does still have a ways
> > to go.)
>
> Yes, there are several bugs related to SafeD.
>
> Andrei
Are the remaining issues at the compiler, runtime, or phobos levels (or
what combination of the three)? Are the bugs filed?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list