Javascript bytecode

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 05:43:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 1:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> Note that in the first place, bytecode discussion has started 
>> with the need of
>> provide a CTFEable module that do not contains more 
>> information that what is in
>> a DI file, as it is a concern for some companies.
>>
>> Bytecode can solve that problem nicely IMO. You mentioned that 
>> DI is superior
>> here, but I don't really understand how.
>
> No, it doesn't solve that problem at all. I explained why 
> repeatedly.

No you explained that java's bytecode doesn't solve that problem. 
Which is quite different.