Javascript bytecode

[Walter Bright]

On 12/21/2012 12:07 PM, jerro wrote:
>> Optimized LLVM bytecode look like a good candidate for the job. Note that I'm
>> not suggesting this as a spec, but as an example of possible solution.
>
> It's true that it couldn't be automatically decompiled to something equivalent
> to the original D source, but it does contain type information. Its human
> readable form (llvm assembly language) is easier to understand than assembly.

I haven't looked at the format, but if it's got type information, that goes 
quite a long way towards supporting automatic decompilation.