About Go, D module naming
Han
needtoknow at basis.only.net
Mon Dec 24 01:53:12 PST 2012
Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/22/2012 8:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I think this is a fallacious argument because it concludes that
>> apples should be peeled because oranges should.
>
> Given, in C++:
>
> struct S
> {
> public:
> void foo(int);
> private:
> void foo(float);
> }
>
> void bar()
> {
> S s;
> s.foo(1.0f);
> }
>
> This is an error in C++:
>
> foo.cpp:6: error: âvoid S::foo(float)â is private
>
> (I used g++ so nobody would complain this is a defect in dmc++.)
>
> Why does this never come up on peoples' complaints about C++? I spent
> some time googling it, and came up with nothing.
>
> I don't think it can be dismissed as fallacious unless the why's have
> a rationale.
you say you won't be his bitch. but aren't you a sissy fagot that
solicited Andrei?? You requested "the big dick" and whaat?
Nuff said: Walter is a prison bitch, Andrei is tool.
I could be wrong, correct me if so, I get so drunk (but whoa!!! I may be a
drunk, but I'm not a Walterbitch.
:P
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list