D "Swing"
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Mon Dec 24 09:35:12 PST 2012
On 2012-12-24 14:51, Chris wrote:
> No, of course not. But the bugs would be in-house, i.e. in one place and
> could be dealt with immedieately, whereas with native bindings you have
> two possible sources for bugs, one of which (the native os) you have no
> control over whatsoever.
You always need to have some kind of connection to some other
library/platform, be it a web browser or the native GUI of the system.
You might be able to minimize that connection and minimize the number of
bugs there is always the possibility of bugs.
> I don't actually care how exactly a standard GUI toolkit for D is
> accomplished (I am not into software-philosophical debates) as long as
> it is done and done quickly (My apologies, I sound like a CEO now!). I
> only have my doubts whether DWT is really the best solution or whether
> we are just wasting time.
DWT is done (well, nothing is ever done but useable) now, except from
for Mac OS X. Can you point me to some other GUI library that is done
and is using a non-native approach?
Well, now that I'm thinking about it there's GTK, which is basically the
only other GUI option for D that is usable. GTK is far from native.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list