The One-Letter Nested Function - a sample article for some kind

[Iain Buclaw]

On 13 February 2012 17:01, Zach the Mystic
<reachzachatgooglesmailservice at dot.com> wrote:
> On 2/13/12 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
>>
>> Zach the Mystic:
>>
>> Regarding pure random generators, I have asked it too:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249
>
>
> Aren't "pure" and "random" diametrically opposed in a fundamental way?

I'd say it was an oxymoron.

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';