Why is there no or or and ?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 17 February 2012 05:14, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:00:39PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 2/16/2012 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> >Well, in that case, we should replace 'in' with '∈'.
>>
>> I would, but that doesn't work because of keyboarding issues.
>
> I wasn't being serious.  I was going to suggest to those who complain
> about && being too similar to &, that we should adopt ∧ and ∨ instead.
> Nice and readable, and unambiguous. And we could use ∀ instead of
> 'foreach'; that would save so much typing!  I mean, D is already
> standardized on Unicode, why not take advantage of all those nice
> symbols that Unicode provides? ;-) (As long as you don't mention APL,
> everybody will be just fine.)
>

This is starting to sound more and more like Feep's little compiler
project Neat (formerly fcc).


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';