[your code here]

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/17/12 8:18 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 08:57 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Saturday, February 18, 2012 02:53:44 Timon Gehr wrote:
>>> If you want it to be executable as a script, rdmd works just fine.
>>
>> But is there any guarantee that rdmd will even be on the system? It
>> seems much
>> safer to me to use dmd, since dmd _will_ be there if you're
>> programming in D,
>> but rdmd may or may not be there.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
> Aah, whoops. I forgot about dmd -run.

I think rdmd can be safely assumed to be alongside dmd. If our 
installers don't do that, they're in error.

Andrei