Setting a deadline for setting up shared ?

Brad Roberts braddr at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 23 11:45:05 PST 2012


On 2/23/2012 5:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> Shared in D2 has been a stub for ages now.
> 
> I'm affraid it will never get implemented if we don't define any priority for it.
> 
> D2 is supposed to provide a very elegant way to handle concurency, but, in the current state of the language, it is
> unusable. If we want that language to succeed (and I believe it has the potential to succeed on the paper) it needs to
> fulfill its promesses.

The under-way release is focusing on completing the regression eliminations (down to 14, pull requests appreciated) and
on const/pure/immutable usability (meaning both dmd implementation issues as well as core phobos issues like Object).
Shared will likely be the focus of the following release.  If not the following one, certainly one of the next few as
it's definitely one of the major implementation gaps.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list