package and virtual

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-01 01:53, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
>
> The spec claims that "all non-sta­tic non-pri­vate non-tem­plate mem­ber func­
> tions are vir­tual," which would mean that package is supposed to be virtual.
> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual. So, is
> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package going to be
> made virtual at some point?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Is anyone even using "package"? I've basically never used it.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg