The God Language

[Caligo]

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "maarten van damme"<maartenvd1994 at gmail.com**>  wrote in message
>> news:mailman.1985.1325157846.**24802.digitalmars-d at puremagic.**com...
>>
>>> I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
>>> string theory :)
>>>
>>
>> I heard on the Science Channel that M-theory was becoming favored over
>> string therory. (Not that I would actually know.)
>>
>>  I have actually thought of the whole universe as one big simulation,
>>> would
>>> really explain how light waves without medium (like a math function).
>>>
>>>
>> I came across a book one time that talked about the 'verse basically being
>> one big quantum computer. I didn't actually red through it though, and I
>> can't remember what it was called... :(
>>
>>  If I were god I would def use object oriented because it makes for easy
>>> describing of different particles and strings. and I'm pretty sure there
>>> is
>>> no garbage collector included in gods language :p
>>>
>>>
>> If I were god, then I'd presumably be omnipotent, and if I were
>> omnipotent,
>> then I'd be able to do it all in something like FuckFuck, or that
>> shakesperian language, or that lolcat language without any difficulty.
>> And I
>> could just fix any limitations in the implementation. So that would seem
>> the
>> best option :)
>>
>>
>>
> God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot
> solve.
>

He has; the human race.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120102/e8be4150/attachment.html>