Specialization - Major hole in the spec?

[Trass3r]

On Thursday, 5 January 2012 at 15:11:13 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 10:14 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> In any case, it is surely a bug. I have *explicitly* specified 
>> that T
>> must be int, yet it has called a version with T == float.
>
> No it has called a version with T : float. ":" means 
> "implicitly converts to". This is by design.

I think we should rename this to something like 'type constraint' 
instead of specialization (and add the explanation that it means 
implicitly converts). As this thread shows C++ programmers will 
be confused otherwise.