SIMD support...

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 1/7/12 10:19 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 January 2012 at 16:10:32 UTC, Don wrote:
>> Sorry Andrei, I have to disagree with that in the strongest possible
>> terms. I would have mentioned AAs as a very strong argument in the
>> opposite direction!
>
> Amen. AAs are *still* broken from this change.

Well they are broken because the change has not been carried to completion.

I think that baking AAs in the compiler is poor programming language 
design. There are absolutely no ifs and buts about it, and the matter is 
obvious enough to me and sufficiently internalized to cause me 
difficulty to argue it.


Andrei