Pow operator precedence

[Walter Bright]

On 1/13/2012 11:25 AM, Manu wrote:
> Fair call. I buy this argument. If there is a precedent set by (multiple) other
> languages towards this precedence (and none against), then so be it.
> If there were a vote though, I'd vote for it being deprecated on grounds of
> offering nothing to the language more than confusion.

I suspect that pow may be better off as a compiler intrinsic.