Message-Passing

[Manu]

On 22 January 2012 18:42, Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org> wrote:

> The popularity of a language has no bearing on the quality of one of its
> features. Are there other message passing schemes you prefer?
>

As said in the original post, I think receiveOnly() is the most intuitive
API. I just think that one should be named receive(), and perhaps receive()
may be renamed receiveMulti(). Surely that would be more intuitive to more
people?
Also both Only and Multi varieties should have a Timeout version, and I
would love to see a poll()/pollMulti() function.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120122/3b5170ca/attachment.html>