Message-Passing

Sean Kelly sean at invisibleduck.org
Sun Jan 22 15:49:00 PST 2012


The names as they exist match what's in TDPL, so they're somewhat set in stone. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 January 2012 23:34, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> On 1/22/12 3:18 PM, Manu wrote:
> On 22 January 2012 18:42, Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org
> 
> <mailto:sean at invisibleduck.org>> wrote:
> 
>    The popularity of a language has no bearing on the quality of one of
>    its features. Are there other message passing schemes you prefer?
> 
> 
> As said in the original post, I think receiveOnly() is the most
> intuitive API. I just think that one should be named receive(), and
> perhaps receive() may be renamed receiveMulti(). Surely that would be
> more intuitive to more people?
> 
> Names will not change.
> 
> Why? Surely API's being as intuitive as possible should be a key goal for a standard library?
> The thing isn't supposed to be stable yet is it? If you take the attitude that no name should ever be changed, then I think there is a problem with the phobos contribution process.
> Phobos contributions have basically no incubation time/process. I've seen others suggest new stuff should go in exp.xxx to incubate, and it should only be promoted to std after some time, or some successful usage in multiple large-ish projects?
> It's a shame that basic usability things like that couldn't be caught earlier.
> 
> Do you disagree that receive() and receiveMulti() (with the crazy var-arg-of-delegates API that nobody would have ever seen in any popular language before) is a far more intuitive approach?
> C# is awesome because it gets this right. I think that's its single greatest achievement, and can not be understated.
> 
> Also both Only and Multi varieties should have a Timeout version, and I
> would love to see a poll()/pollMulti() function.
> 
> This is sensible. You may want to add functions through pull requests, or make enhancement requests on bugzilla.
> 
> Shall do one or the other.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120122/05328c2e/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list