DStep
bls
bizprac at orange.fr
Thu Jan 26 10:08:32 PST 2012
On 01/26/2012 09:51 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 17:08, bls wrote:
>> On 01/26/2012 07:51 AM, Trass3r wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for my ignorance but why should one use DStep instead of htod
>>>>> in order to port plain vanilla C headers ? I have to admit that I
>>>>> haven't tried DStep yet.
>>>>
>>>> htod is Windows-only.
>>>
>>> And it sucks.
>>> For example it drops const, runs the preprocessor instead of turning
>>> preprocessor directives into proper D equivalents, horribly messes up
>>> the comments (esp. comments for enum members),...
>>
>> Ok,Thanks for clarification! Seems that DStep is a missing link in the D
>> tool-chain and should be part of the DMD package
>> I'll try DStep ASAP on libxml2 and libxslt. Will let you know how it
>> works for me.
>> Thanks, Bjoern
>
> DStep has nothing to do with XML. It uses the Clang C API to create D
> bindings.
>
libxml2 is a plain c library
http://xmlsoft.org/
libxslt dito.
http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
?? May you mix it up. In order to create *bindings* to C++ libs doxygens
xml output seems to be perfect.
To _port_ C headers DStep is probaly the right tool. But I just see that
I have to build llvm and what the heck.. :(
Now, in order to parse doxygens xml output std.xml is not good enough.
In other words it would be nice to have libxml2 as D lib available.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list