Do we need Win95/98/Me support?

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Sat Jan 28 02:35:05 PST 2012


On Friday, 27 January 2012 at 21:52:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> So, Win2K+, which is probably what we'll be doing. It should be 
> noted, however, that that's a .NET 2.0 application

And it works on a good range of oses and does useful and pretty 
nifty things. And, you know, it will take ages before phobos 
could become comparable to .net framework 2.0.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list