On 07/11/2012 08:00 PM, David Piepgrass wrote: > ... > Oh, I can't tell you what a pet peeve PITA the C precedence is. Ugh! I > know it's against D philosophy to change the precedence w.r.t. C, but > how about a compromise: give a warning or error for "x&2 > 0", with > error message: "add parenthesis around x&2 to clarify your intention." > That is what D does : )