All right, all right! Interim decision regarding qualified Object methods

[Tobias Pankrath]

> Another weapon to attack the problem is introducing in the DMD 
> back-end an optimization (already present in LLVM, but I think 
> not used on default), merging of functions with the same body 
> (leaving just a jump as the body of the removed function, to 
> keep their function pointers distinct).

Why not drop that requirement? What is the use case of different 
function pointers for different but equivalent functions? Does 
anyone depend on this?