All right, all right! Interim decision regarding qualified Object methods

[Roman D. Boiko]

On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 12:36:18 UTC, RivenTheMage wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 12:06:49 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
>> Jon Skeet wrote on this long ago:
>
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/jon_skeet/archive/2008/12/05/redesigning-system-object-java-lang-object.aspx
>
>>The fact that every object has a monitor associated with it was 
>>a
>>mistake in Java, and was unfortunately copied in .NET. This 
>>promotes the bad practice of locking on "this" and on types - 
>>both of which are typically publicly accessible references. I 
>>believe that unless a reference is exposed explicitly for the 
>>purpose of locking (like ICollection.SyncRoot) then you should 
>>avoid locking on any reference which other code knows about.
>
> This has been discussed multiple times on the D forum, I 
> believe.

Do you mean Monitor or all other issues from that post as well? 
Do you have any links? I would be interested to know conclusions.