All right, all right! Interim decision regarding qualified Object methods

[deadalnix]

On 12/07/2012 13:41, bearophile wrote:
> Another weapon to attack the problem is introducing in the DMD back-end
> an optimization (already present in LLVM, but I think not used on
> default), merging of functions with the same body (leaving just a jump
> as the body of the removed function, to keep their function pointers
> distinct).
>

That is IMO the way to go instead of cluttering the language.