Just where has this language gone wrong?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-07-19 17:03, Petr Janda wrote:
>> It's just syntax. Eliminating syntax noise is fine. Code should look
>> like what it does.
>
> Not if "eliminating noise" equals to making things harder to understand.
>
> When you say (int x) { return x; } it's clear about what it is, a
> _function_ without name.

It's equally clear when you see: =>.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg