Just where has this language gone wrong?

[Paulo Pinto]

Am 23.07.2012 14:49, schrieb Stuart:
> On Saturday, 21 July 2012 at 22:16:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>> C++ is living in the 70's.
>
> Precisely what I have been thinking. It's a loose wrapper around
> assembly, nothing more. Certainly not the "high-level language"
> it's touted as.

Only due to the lack of modules.

Everything else is a pretty modern language I would say.

Personally as I referred here in multiple threads I don't have any
big issues dealing with C++, but maybe that is just me.

--
Paulo