Impressed

[Stuart]

On Saturday, 28 July 2012 at 02:38:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, July 28, 2012 04:31:40 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>> But note, even then, that D only targets 32-bit architectures
>> and up, while C can handle 16-bit architectures.
>
> True, but I'm kind of shocked that anything 16-bit even still 
> exists. _32-bit_
> is on its way out. I thought that 16-bit was dead _years_ ago. 
> I guess that
> some embedded stuff must use it. But really, I wouldn't expect 
> the lack of 16-
> bit support to be much of an impediment - if any at all - and 
> in the long run,
> it'll mean absolutely nothing.

Embedded systems mostly use Java now in any case, as I understand
it.