Incomprehensible compiler errors
Stuart
stugol at gmx.com
Tue Jul 31 10:35:18 PDT 2012
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 10:59:49 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
>
> Yeah, we still have *miles* to go on the toolchain. As a
> community we've been putting most of our effort into getting
> the compiler stable, and to a lesser extent working on the the
> standard library. Most of the other things are one-man shows.
> The Eclipse plugin and DFL have both been abandoned for years.
> Mono-D and VisualD are progressing quite well but again they
> are only one-man shows.
>
> We need more people.
Agreed. I don't know if I can help much - I'm not an expert on
low-level things like compilers and such, and I do my best work
in .NET; but there may be something I can do. Maybe write a
better IDE, with intellisense, I dunno. It'd have to be .NET
based.
Or maybe I could work with you guys on devising a new DFL. I've
had loads of experience with the .NET standard library for GUIs
(System.Windows.Forms). I don't have much experience in the D
language, but if it was a joint effort, that wouldn't matter so
much. What does everyone think? (Except Jakob, who thinks I'm
ignorant)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list