On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:50:16 -0400, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote: > On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: >> No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL. > > We have it. It's called "malloc"! Oh sorry, I meant *GC.malloc* :) -Steve