On Thursday, 7 June 2012 at 22:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 6/7/12 3:04 PM, Timon Gehr wrote: >> 'min' is not complicated. > > I agree. Then how come it has a bug where it doesn't work with user-defined types? Maybe it isn't complicated per your definition, but it's complicated enough that it has a bug for a prominent use case.