Making uniform function call syntax more complete a feature

[Tommi]

As I see it, the goal of uniform function call syntax, as 
described here http://www.drdobbs.com/blogs/cpp/232700394, is to 
allow non-intrusively extending the functionality of a type. I 
think the current implementation comes short in accomplishing 
this goal on two accounts:

1) You can't non-intrusively add static member functions
2) You can't non-intrusively add constructors

So, I'm suggesting these two features to be added to the language:

1. Static method lowering rules
     If function calls like the following are encountered...
     A) Type.compute(<ARGUMENTS>);
     B) Type.compute; // it's a static @property function
     ...and the compute functions haven't been implemented by Type,
     they get lowered into free function calls...
     A) compute!(Type)(<ARGUMENTS>);
     B) compute!(Type);

2. Constructors as free functions
     If a constructor call hasn't been implemented by Type...
     auto t = Type(<ARGUMENTS>);
     ...then it get's lowered into a free function call...
     auto t = this!(Type)(<ARGUMENTS>);
     (or something like that)