On 19 June 2012 09:18, Don Clugston <dac at nospam.com> wrote: > So would I. Can you think of one? > It was the best name I could come up with, given that the 'pure' was the > keyword. > We want a word that means 'no hidden state'. I thought that was what pure was for. :~) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';