GDC review process.
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Tue Jun 19 12:05:11 PDT 2012
Iain Buclaw:
> "Does D *really* require a new calling convention?
> Also does it *really* require naked support?
I guess the answers are yes and yes.
> I think naked support is a bad idea
Maybe he/she's wrong, and it's a good idea. Where are the deep
discussions that justify his/her words?
> and people who require naked support should be writing an
> assembly function wrapper."
Why? And why they have to impose a design on another language
they haven't designed? They are the oweners of their compilers
and D is a guest, but imposing too much of your customs on a
guest is not polite.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list