GDC review process.

[Walter Bright]

On 6/19/2012 11:57 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> To quote from one of the i386 backend maintainers:
> ---
> "Does D *really* require a new calling convention?

No, but the idea was to allow D to innovate on calling conventions without 
disturbing code that needed to interface with C.

> Also does it *really* require naked support?
> I think naked support is a bad idea
> and people who require naked support should be writing an assembly
> function wrapper."
> ---

Naked support allows people to write max efficient assembler without needing to 
exit the language and use the (often miserable) standalone assembler.