Get rid of isInfinite()?

[Mehrdad]

On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 23:03:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> You could store those elements internally as you iterate over 
> them



That's *precisely* the point of my wrapper... sorry if that 
wasn't clear.

Why shouldn't that be sufficient for making it random-access?






> If you can somehow figure out how to do that via buffering, 
> then you could make it a forward range as well as whatever 
> other range types you could define the functions for, but you'd 
> have to figure out a way to define save.



OK, now we're at the same place. :P

What I'm saying is, I __CAN__ get the buffering to work.

What I __cannot__ figure out what to do with is 'length'... I 
can't think of anything reasonable to return, since it's not 
infinite (which I might represent as ulong.max, if anything) but 
it's unbounded.


So the _ONLY_ problem I'm running into right now is length() -- 
any ideas how I could fix that?