package and virtual

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-01 11:12, deadalnix wrote:
> Le 01/03/2012 01:53, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
>> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
>>
>> The spec claims that "all non-sta­tic non-pri­vate non-tem­plate
>> mem­ber func­
>> tions are vir­tual," which would mean that package is supposed to be
>> virtual.
>> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual.
>> So, is
>> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package
>> going to be
>> made virtual at some point?
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> I think virtuality and package should have nothing to with one another.
> package is supposed ot express visibility, not change behavior.

Currently we don't have a "virtual" keyword, meaning everything would 
need to be virtual.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg