Multiple return values...

[Mantis]

09.03.2012 2:23, Manu пишет:
> On 9 March 2012 01:56, Mantis <mail.mantis.88 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:mail.mantis.88 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     [...]
>     Is tuple required to be anonymous struct? I thought it's
>     implementation details that may be done the other way if tuples
>     implemented in language rather then library. There's another
>     problem with non-named return values, as this:
>     auto (sin_a, cos_a) = sincos( a );
>     is not equivalent to this:
>     auto (cos_a, sin_a) = sincos( a );
>
>
> I can't imagine a syntax that's non-destructive to the existing 
> grammar where order is not important, but order would be clearly 
> stated in the auto-complete pop-up, and in the reference. Also 
> mismatching types would throw errors.

You can't mess with the parameters order in this case: 
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36715190/Images/par_order.jpg
Is it impossible to make efficient multiple return values without the 
need to trade off the help from tools?