Breaking backwards compatiblity

[H. S. Teoh]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:26:48PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:12:34 -0500, Adam D. Ruppe
> <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 22:32:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>This is why we need to have a VERY high bar for breaking changes.
> >
> >Please remember this if someone proposes enforcing
> >@property by default.

I propose enabling @property by default.


> Clears the bar with room to spare IMO.
> 
> Not to mention it's not just a proposal, but in print in TDPL .
> 
> (dons flame war proof suit)
[...]

I don't see what's there to flamewar about. AFAIK @property enforcement
is going to happen sooner or later.


T

-- 
There is no gravity. The earth sucks.