Breaking backwards compatiblity

[sclytrack]

On 03/10/2012 08:31 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I was pretty happy with 3.1. It's terrible in retrospect, but viewed in the
> context of the early 90's, I don't think it was bad at all. Maybe not as
> stable as the Unix of the time (I wouldn't know), but it was usable by mere
> mortals and was still a lot more robust than WinMe.
>
> But then around the time of 98SE and Me, the 9x line just wasn't up to even
> the current expectations of the time. (And maybe my memory's foggy, but I
> seem to remember having more troubles with 98 than I did with 3.1. And Me
> was definitely much worse.)
>
>
My grandfather still uses 3.11

I gave him my old computer (Athlon) with Windows 7. But no after a week 
he wanted his old system back.