Breaking backwards compatiblity

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:tfdzpwcijnavdalmnzit at forum.dlang.org...
> On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 18:57:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> It can hardly be called a success technology-wise.
>
> It is significantly ahead of its competition at the time.

And it was a big advancement over 3.1. Pre-emptive multitasking anyone?