Arbitrary abbreviations in phobos considered ridiculous
Stewart Gordon
smjg_1998 at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 11 14:49:34 PDT 2012
On 11/03/2012 19:44, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
<snip>
> I wouldn't make it an online editor. Just let a normal editor
> access remote files. Done. As for specifically html documents on
> the web, doesn't http already have provisions for updating anyway?
HTTP has a PUT method, but I'm not sure it's widely supported. Nowadays, practically
everyone uses FTP to upload web pages. Either that or a web-based file manager such as
free hosts tend to provide instead of FTP access.
> Hell, the *original* web browser was *both* an editor and a viewer.
What kind of editor - raw HTML, WYSIWYM, WYSINWYG or something else entirely?
> But then Mosaic came along, scrapped the editor part, and
> everything since has followed suit.
I guess the authors of Mosaic were bothered about enabling people to browse the web,
rather than to create web pages.
But there were a few other combined browsers and editors to come, like Netscape Navigator
Gold (the editor part of which later broke away into Netscape Composer, or so I was told)....
Stewart.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list