Three Unlikely Successful Features of D

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:utkgtgcgguydxrabkily at forum.dlang.org...
>
> But, eh, D pwns C++ in so many ways that while I still
> like C++, I'm no longer in the camp of "c++ is obviously
> great and totally sufficient and if you don't see it,
> you must be some kind of idiot" like I was for a while.

Heh, yea. I think in a way that's kind of the problem with C++: It can be 
technically considered "sufficient"...but that's it - it's *merely* 
sufficient. "Why have a Pop-Tart(tm) when you can have a warm delicious 
Pillsbury(tm) Toaster Strudel(tm)?" ;)