Proposal: __traits(code, ...) and/or .codeof

[Timon Gehr]

On 03/22/2012 07:08 PM, F i L wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 18:06:24 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote:
>> in addition to .codeof, let's think about .astof returning an abstract
>> syntax tree.
>
> I agree, as stated on the IRC, .astof (and therefor .astof.toString())
> is a much better concept.

I think that would necessitate the addition of AST macros.