DIP16: Transparently substitute module with package

[Timon Gehr]

On 03/31/2012 03:49 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:06:36 +0200, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
>
>> On 03/30/2012 11:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> But personally, I like the idea of making it so that publicly
>>> imported symbols
>>> can be accessed as if they were in the module that publicly imported
>>> them
>>
>> +1. That is even better than treating the package module specially.
>
> That already works, doesn't it?

It already works indeed. My bad.