Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(
Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com
Sat May 5 11:41:55 PDT 2012
The effect is the same. You have a new type with a new init, that
behaves the same way.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com> wrote:
> The one with TypeDef?
>
> That's not how it's defined though.
>
> On Saturday, 5 May 2012 at 18:31:44 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>> See my version.
--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list