Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(

[Chris Cain]

On Sunday, 6 May 2012 at 03:28:32 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
> To @Chris Cain as well, my response there was rather hostile 
> too -- my apologies about that as well.

It's OK. The only reason I was asking is because I may have been 
able to offer you a better alternative to what you're actually 
trying to accomplish, because it seems like to me you're always 
trying to code C++ in D.