Does D have too many features?
foobar
foo at bar.com
Tue May 8 10:24:23 PDT 2012
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 17:03:10 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 16:35:05 UTC, foobar wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 14:59:43 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 14:48:27 UTC, foobar wrote:
>>>> [...], what if I find it useful to use e.g. FORTRAN code,
>>>> should the relevant functions also be in the stdlib?
>>>
>>> No, FORTRAN has absolutely nothing to do with D. C, on the
>>> other hand, does. Both druntime and Phobos depend heavily on
>>> the C stdlib. The GC uses malloc/free, std.stdio.File is a
>>> wrapper around FILE*, etc.
>>>
>>> -Lars
>>
>> Irrelevant. For all I care druntime could be implemented in
>> Klingon. That doesn't mean its API needs to include Klingon as
>> well. That's called "encapsulation".
>
> Um... so you don't mind the C/POSIX declarations being there,
> you just want them to be private so you aren't tempted to use
> them in your own code?
>
> -Lars
Yes, pretty much.
They are an implementation detail of druntime/phobos.
Other vendors may choose to implement the tool-chain with another
language in mind and as long as the API remains the same I
shouldn't need to care e.g. how the GC allocation is implemented
(Perhaps it's done with FORTRAN's memory allocation routines).
If I ,the user, want to interface with C I need to use the
"official" C headers in Deimos. This is after all the official
location for that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list