Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Tue May 8 13:48:52 PDT 2012
On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 20:58:50 mta`chrono wrote:
> Am 08.05.2012 16:03, schrieb bearophile:
> > Steven Schveighoffer:
> >> But making std.typecons.TypeDef work *is* a valid path to get what you
> >> want (typedefs that work like they used to). If that isn't possible,
> >> let's fix the language constructs that are blocking it!
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > Bye,
> > bearophile
>
> Maybe it's not directly related to this topic, but shouldn't that be
> rather part of druntime?
Only if something else in druntime needs it, which it doesn't.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list