Lack of open source shown as negative part of D on Dr. Dobbs

[H. S. Teoh]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Don Clugston wrote:
> On 10/05/12 11:02, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> >Assuming that LLVM is not an acceptable backend despite its
> >permissive licence, and that the community can't buy out the code,
> >I'd suggest again the idea of stabilizing the frontend and then
> >synchronizing DMD, GDC and LDC updates, with all 3 endorsed as
> >equally valid implementations of the reference standard.
> 
> Yes. This is what we need to work towards.
[...]

+1.


T

-- 
The easy way is the wrong way, and the hard way is the stupid way. Pick one.