Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(

[H. S. Teoh]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:04:52PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
[...]
> struct S
> {
>   int x;
>   static S opNull() { return S(0);}
> }
> 
> S s = null; // equivalent to S(0);
[...]

Wait, is this existing syntax, or proposed syntax?

It would be mindblowingly awesome if it was existing syntax...


T

-- 
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners... -- Slashdotter